Daily Market Update – October 13, 2014

 

  

 

Daily Market Update – October 13, 2014 (9:00 AM)

After 3 weeks of triple digit moves that seem to be getting bigger, the volatility has really climbed and is now at a two year high level, although still not terribly high by historical standards.

There isn’t very much happening this week as far as economic reports go, but lately it has been the injudicious use of words that have made markets move as nerves may be more frayed than is healthy.

This week there aren’t too many scheduled speeches, talks or conferences, so it’s possible that the market may actually focus on fundamentals, like earnings, which start going in full force this week.

For more than a year each quarterly earnings season has been lead off by strong earnings from the financial sector, especially the big money center banks, but the rest of teh market hasn’t necessarily kept up, especially on the retail side.

This year, the laggard is likely to be the energy sector and their forward guidance may be especially critical, while retail may be expected to do better than in the past.

If the focus does turn to earnings this week should be one with much less volatility, but predicting what may happen coming after the past three weeks is probably not a good idea.

This week, with less cash than I would like to have, but still uncertain about whether there i still more declines ahead, I’m not eager to spend much money.

As mentioned in the Weekend in Review, I may be more inclined to look at put sales as a means of entering positions and creating the week’s revenue streams.

However, based on where premiums were headed as the market came to its close on Friday, the volatility may be at that level where it may become possible to start thinking increasingly about DOH trades.

Doing so, though, requires some more nimbleness, in the event that an unwanted assignment looks as if iy may occur.

While I generally look at DOH trades as being short term, depending on where those premiums are and whether they extend to forward week contracts, there may be reason to consider their use in some out of the money expanded contracts.

Further, as earnings season is now also a factor, selective positions may also have their premiums enhanced by earnings, so there may be opportunity for the DOH trades to encompass the earnings enhancement and also take advantage of volatility enhanced time premium.

So this week the trading may be of a very different nature, although as always, once the opening bell rings, all of those well laid out plans may get scuttled.

The real challenge ahead is trying to discern between what seems to be a sea of value from the value traps that just want to suck up your investment dollars.

There’s certainly no reason to rush in to commit cash reserves at this point, especially resisting the temptation to get lured in by any single day’s strong move higher, as those tend to occur with great frequency during downtrends and just serve to have you buy at artificially higher prices.

Instead, I would be very happy to create the week’s income from simply selling as many calls as possible on existing positions and would certainly welcome a one day pop higher as the stimulus to do so.

This morning’s pre-opening futures are showing recovery from last nights early trading and the volatility is heading lower, but it’s not too likely that will impact option premiums that at Friday’s close were exceptionally high for a number of out of favor stocks in equally out of favor sectors.

So this morning may be a good one to sit back and see how the trading evolves after the opening bell, while assuming a defensive posture for the rest of the week.

Dashboard – October 13 – 17, 2014

 

 

 

 

 

SELECTIONS

MONDAY A generally quiet week, but lately words have been mopre meaningful than actual data. Strong earnings reports starting this week with banks could be the thing the markets need.

TUESDAY    A very disappointing market day yesterday and, as a result, not a single trade to show for the effort. The effort to move higher lasted about 20 minutes and quickly gave way to uncertainty, before completely falling apart in the final hour. This morning seems tentative, at best.

WEDNESDAY: Despite yesterday’s decent finish to trading and Intel’s decent earning’s report, the market looks to be back to the path it had established nearly 4 weeks ago and is headed toward another triple digit down day, based on the opening futures.

THURSDAY:   Yesterday’s attempt to rally going into the close was a positive sign, but this morning’s futures point to another triple digit move lower. Even Goldman Sachs’ better than expected earnings are met with an initial sharp move lower this morning and does nothing to buoy markets.

FRIDAY:   Hang on, as the fourth week of triple digit moves comes to its end. FInally. But who knows what next week brings. For one, I’d like to see some sanity, which is marked by normal sized moves in either direction, rather than the “new normal” sized moves and give traders a chance to more rationally look at their positions.

 



 

                                                                                                                                           

Today's TradesCash-o-Meter

 

 

 





 “SNEAK PEEK AT NEXT WEEK” APPEARS ON FRIDAYS

Sneak PeekPie Chart Distribution

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Weekly Summary

  

Weekend Update – October 12, 2014

As The Federal Reserve’s policy of “Quantitative Easing” comes to an end the next phase considered should perhaps be one of instituting some form of “Quantitative Muzzling.”

Given comments contained in this past week’s FOMC statement had recognized global economic concerns, perhaps the Federal Reserve should consider expanding its dual mandate and reaching across the ocean to affix, adjust and tighten the right remedy.

As most of us learned sometime in childhood, words have consequences. However, we tend not to mind when the consequences are positive for us or when what we all know is left unsaid and ignored.

In each of the past two weeks words from the European Central Bank’s President Mario Draghi have had adverse impacts on global markets. While no one is overtly suggesting that ECB President’s should be seen and not heard, undoubtedly at least one person is thinking that, having applied a sloppy test of correlation to the market’s moves and Draghi’s words.

Such sloppy tests may have at least as much validity as the much discussed “key reversal” seen as trading closed on Wednesday and said to presage a bullish turnaround to the downtrend.

How did that work out for most people?

This week Draghi told us what everyone knows to be the truth, but what no one wants to hear. He simply said that there can be no growth in the European economies without economic reform.

That’s not different from what he said the previous week, as he pointed out that political solutions were necessary to deal with economic woes.

We also all know if it we have to rely on politicians to do the right thing, or make the difficult decisions, we’re not going to fare terribly well, hence the sell-offs. Why the Europeans can’t simply kick things down the road and then forget about it is a question that needs to be asked.

Compare the response to Draghi’s comments to the absolutely effusive response to this past week’s FOMC statement that simply said nothing and ignored answering the question that everyone wanted to ignore.

Despite everyone knowing what Draghi has been saying to be true, having had the same scolding take place in the U.S. just two years ago, no one with an investment portfolio wants to hear of such a thing, especially when it’s followed up with downgrades of Finland’s and France’s credit ratings.

Add to the mix the International Monetary Fund’s cut to its global growth forecast and you have spoken volumes to an already wary US market that was now eagerly eying any breach of the 200 day S&P 500 moving average (dma), as that had taken the place of the “key reversal” in the hearts and minds of technicians and foisted upon investors as being the gateway to what awaits.

Unfortunately, the message being sent with that technical indicator is a bearish one. While it has been breached on numerous occasions in the past 5 years, the most pronounced and prolonged stay below the 200 dma came in the latter half of 2011, a period when triple digit daily moves were commonplace and volatility was more than double the now nearly 2 year high level.

I miss those days.

As usual, the week’s potential stock selections are classified as being in Traditional, Double Dip Dividend, Momentum or “PEE” categories.

When I first started thinking about a theme for this week’s article I decided to focus on stocks that had already undergone their own personal 10% correction.

That list grew substantially by the time the week came to its close following a brief FOMC induced rally mid-week and that thesis was abandoned.

As trading in the coming week opens at a DJIA level lower than where it began the year, there’s not much reason to start the week with any sense of confidence.

While the S&P 500 is only 5.2% below its recent high, putting it on par with numerous “mini-corrections” over the past two years, you don’t have to do a quantitative assessment to know that this decline feels differently from the others, as volatility is at a two year high point. The sudden appearance of triple digit moves have now gone from the mundane 100 point variety and have added 200 and 300 point ones into the arsenal.

For me, this week may be a little different. Heading into the week I have less cash reserves than I would like and less confidence than I would ordinarily need to dwindle it down further.

While it appears as if there are so many values to be had I would prefer to see some sign of stability before committing resources in my usual buy/write manner. Instead, I may be more likely to add new positions through the sale of out of the money puts, unless there is a dividend involved.

Additionally, while individual stocks may have compelling reasons to consider their purchases, this week I’m less focused on those specific reasons rather than the nature of their recent price declines and the ability to capitalize on the heightened option premiums associated with their recent volatility.

One of the benefits of this rising volatility environment is that option premiums grow as does the uncertainty. The sale of puts and anticipation of the need to rollover those puts in the event of further price erosion may be better suited to an environment of continuing price declines, rather than utilizing a traditional buy/write strategy.

Furthermore, as the premiums become more and more attractive, I find myself more inclined to attempt to rollover positions that might otherwise be assigned, as the accumulation of premiums can offer significant downside protection and reduces the need to find alternative investment candidates.

If you’re looking for a sector that is screaming “correction” you really don’t have to look beyond the Energy Sector. Hearing so many analysts calling for continued decline in oil prices may be reason enough to begin considering adding positions.

Over the years I’ve lost track of how many times I’ve owned Halliburton (HAL), but other than during the 2008-2009 market crash, the time of the Deepwater Horizon disaster and during the tumultuous market of 2011, there haven’t been such precipitous declines in its price, as it has just plunged below its own 200 dma.

Although Halliburton doesn’t report earnings until the following week, next week’s premiums are reflective of the volatility anticipated. For anyone considering this position through a buy/write one factor to keep in mind is that it will be imperative to rollover the contract if expiration looks likely. That is the case because earnings are reported on the following Monday morning before trading opens so there won’t be a chance to create a hedging position unless done the previous week.

I have been waiting for an opportunity to repurchase shares of Anadarko Petroleum (APC) ever since a bankruptcy judge approved a pollution related settlement, that was part of its years earlier purchase of Kerr-McGee. Like Halliburton, it is now trading below its 200 dma, but it doesn’t report earnings until a week after Halliburton. However, it also offers exceptionally high option premiums as the perceived risk remains heightened in anticipation of further sector weakness.

Owing to its drops the final two days of the previous week, Dow Chemical (DOW) is now also trading below its 200 dma. It, too, is demonstrating an option premium that is substantially higher than has been the case recently, although the risk appears to be considered less than that seen for both Halliburton and Anadarko. With the exception of having received an “outperform” rating those past two days, Dow Chemical appears to have just been caught up in the market’s downturn.

Fastenal (FAST) has traded below its 200 dma since its last earnings report in July 2014 and was not helped by its latest report this past Friday. That was the case despite generally good revenues, but with softer margins that were expected to continue. Unlike the preceding stocks the option premiums are not expanded in reflection of heightened risk. In the event that this position is initiated with a put sale that is likely to be assigned, I would consider taking possession of shares rather than rolling over the puts, as shares go ex-dividend during the November 2014 option cycle.

For a stock whose price hasn’t done very much, eBay (EBAY) has been getting lots and lots of attention and perhaps it is that attention which has prompted it to finally decide to do what so many have suggested, by releasing plans to spin off its PayPal unit. eBay reports earnings this week and is always a prospect to exhibit a sizeable move. It is currently trading below the point that consider the mid-point of the price range that I like to see when considering a new position. As with some other potential earnings trades, it is a candidate for out of the money put sales before earnings or for those more cautious the sale of puts after earnings in the event of a large price drop upon earnings having been released.

Intel (INTC) reports earnings this week after having already been brutalized this past week along with the rest of the chip sector. Most recently I discussed some hesitancy regarding a position in Intel because it had two price gaps higher in the past few months. However, thanks to the past week it has now erased one of those price gaps that represented additional risk. As with Fastenal there is an upcoming ex-dividend date that may be a consideration in any potential trade.

Following YUM Brands’ (YUM) earnings report last week, many over-reacted during after hours trading and shares quickly recovered to end the following day higher, perhaps buoyed by the enthusiasm following the FOMC Statement. Shares did trend lower the rest of the week, but fared much better than the overall market. This coming week YUM Brands is ex-dividend and based upon its option premium is a veritable sea of calm, although it too is demonstrating growth in premiums as risk is generally heightened.

Finally, Best Buy (BBY) is one of those stocks that has seen its own personal correction, having fallen nearly 13% since the market high just 3 weeks ago. With so much attention having been placed on European concerns it’s hard to think of too many stocks that are so well shielded from some of those perceived risks. Although it doesn’t report earnings for more than a month, this is a position that I would like to maintain for an extended period of time, particularly with its currently bloated option premiums, heading into earnings, which I believe will reflect an improving discretionary spending environment, to Best Buy’s benefit.

Unless of course the muzzle falls off, in which case all bets are off for this week.

Traditional Stocks: Anadarko Petroleum, Dow Chemical, Fastenal, Halliburton

Momentum: Best Buy

Double Dip Dividend: YUM Brands (10/15)

Premiums Enhanced by Earnings: eBay (10/15 AM), Intel (10/14 PM)

Remember, these are just guidelines for the coming week. The above selections may become actionable, most often coupling a share purchase with call option sales or the sale of covered put contracts, in adjustment to and consideration of market movements. The overriding objective is to create a healthy income stream for the week with reduction of trading risk.

Week in Review – October 6 – 10, 2014

 

Option to Profit Week in Review
October 6 – 10,  2014
 
NEW POSITIONS/STO NEW STO ROLLOVERS CALLS ASSIGNED/PUTS EXPIRED CALLS EXPIRED/PUTS ASSIGNED CLOSED
2 / 2 2 6 0  / 0 2  / 0 0

    

Weekly Up to Date Performance

October 6 – 10, 2014

New purchases for the week beat both the unadjusted and adjusted S&P 500 by 1.5% during a week that finally had everyone noticing the back and forth movements of regularity of triple digit moves, now expanding to levels of 200 and 300 points.

However, that is simply in relative terms, as those new positions still fell by 1.6% as compared to the S&P 500, which was 3.1% lower for the week, as the DJIA actually finished below 2013’s close.

It was a week of little news other than the FOMC and some more errant words from Mario Draghi.

That changed Friday afternoon with some credit warnings in Europe, including downgrades of Finnish and French debt.

With no assignments this week performance of closed positions were unchanged from last week and continued to out-perform the S&P 500 performance by 1.7%. They were up 3.5% out-performing the market by 91.8%. 

This was another awful week from most perspectives, if not all.

The only potential positive spin is that Friday ended up on a negative note, which was probably better than an advance, having come off the previous day’s 300+ point decline.

While most analysts and technicians don’t agree on much, they generally do agree that large gains coming on the heels of large losses don’t have any positive meaning. They prefer to see blow-out kind of declines, sort of like getting it out of your system.

The exception is when the gain represents a “key reversal,” and we all know how well that predictive tool worked out.

That kind of further large decline may be the sort of thing that may be in store on Monday, as markets re-open. That’s especially so since the news of the credit downgrades came after  the European markets closed and they haven’t had a chance to respond.

Further, in the US banks are closed for the Columbus Day holiday and that could present some very short term liquidity issues as equity trading goes on as usual.

In some small way I can look to the dividends received this week, which were more than the usual number, and the ability to rollover some positions despite the weakness, as well as the ability to sell some new covered options, as something akin to a positive note.

Somehow, even with a horrible environment there was an opportunity to get 10 OTP trades in for the week.

However, the relative out-performance of positions is of little solace during a week that saw nothing redeeming, other than a brief move higher after release of the FOMC Statement. I suppose it’s nice to have that kind of relative out-performance, but it’s no replacement for the real thing.

After the past 3 weeks are all said and done, the market is down only about 5%, which puts it at the level of most all of the other periodic declines of the past two years. However, it really, really feels like much more because of all of those large moves heading in both directions, but being increasingly a net negative.

For those watching volatility, you may have noticed that before the late sell-off the volatility was rising more than usual given where the day’s change had stood, reflecting the continuing back and forth during the day. Despite having had some of these periodic mini-corrections greater than our current correction, the volatility is now at a two year high, as the back and forth movement continues to be reminiscent of 2011.

If that continues as we head into net week I would envision spending much more time looking for “DOH” trading opportunities. Once the volatility begins to rise those become more and more appealing and can become a primary source of income.

The downside, however, is that they take much more attention and maintenance, as the ideal DOH Trade is one that lasts only for a day or two and sees the contract sold expire worthless. Otherwise you end up chasing the opportunity to rollover the contract in an attempt to avoid being assigned at a strike price that is below your original cost. If you follow my personal trades that’s what happened with some of those trades today.

The positive aspect of the DOH Trades is that during a prolonged downturn it really makes a big difference to be able to squeeze out some premium, particularly as you are able to use strike prices that are generally 2% or more above the current price at the time of the option contract sale, depending on the number of days of contract duration.

While doing so may be a nuisance, it is the kind of nuisance that has me preferring markets that are down trending.

With less cash than I would like at the current market level and despite what look like so many great values, there has to be hesitance about spending any more of the cash reserve down. Ideally, if doing so, it would be in support of other existing positions, such as you might do in cost averaging down, rather than looking for too many new positions.

Still, I don’t expect to actively look for “deals” next week. It’s generally easier to do that when a particular sector or a particular stock is beaten down. It’s much harder to select what may be ready to bounce back when almost everything has been pummeled, so if the market continues in its current pattern the emphasis will be on beginning to generate revenue from existing positions, even if through the use of strike prices below cost.

There are two caveats to all of the above.

One is that with a market moving lower, new positions are often more appropriately entered through the sale of puts and rolling those over, where appropriate or simply taking assignment. So if considering any new positions the sale of puts may be the way to go.

The second caveat regards the DOH trades. 

With a small number of positions set to expire next week as the monthly cycle concludes, I may consider using some expanded weekly option expirations for some potential DOH trades, rather than very short term trades, particularly if there are also upcoming earnings. That would reduce some of their high maintenance and provide more time for any price blips to even out. An example of that might be Las Vegas Sands, which was a DOH trade today and then reports earnings next week. Ideally, the way to enter into that kind of a trade is during a strong price rise and then using a well out of the money strike whose premium will be enhanced by the earnings event.

Otherwise, for now, you’ll be hearing a lot about moving averages the next week and the risk that it presents at a time when people are fleeing from risk. It means nothing except in hindsight. If the 200 DMA proves to be important, you’ll be hearing about it ad nauseum. If not? That will be the end of its mention, just like the “key reversal” has been relegated to the closet.

While the crowd running from risk and an over-reliance on unvalidated technical indicators may normally represent contrarian opportunities, I’m content to wait to see some stability return first.

That’s far more important than a surge higher that only ends up being another in a string of disappointments.

     

This week’s details may be seen in the Weekly Performance spreadsheet * or in the PDF file, as well as as in the summary.below

(Note: Duplicate mention of positions reflects different priced lots):



New Positions Opened:   DOW, EMC

Puts Closed in order to take profits:  none

Calls Rolled over, taking profits, into the next weekly cycle:  none

Calls Rolled over, taking profits, into extended weekly cycle:  DOW (10/31), LVS (10/31), WFM (10/31)

Calls Rolled over, taking profits, into the monthly cycle: none

Calls Rolled Over, taking profits, into a future monthly cycle: BMY (11/22), PBR (11/22)

Calls Rolled Up, taking net profits into same cyclenone

New STO:  GDX (10/24), LVS (10/10)

Put contracts expired: none

Put contracts rolled over: none

Long term call contracts sold:  none

Calls Assigned: none

Calls Expired:  GPS, HAL

Puts Assigned:  none

Stock positions Closed to take profits:  none

Stock positions Closed to take losses: none

Calls Closed to Take Profits: none

Ex-dividend PositionsCHK (10/10 $0.09), CPB (10/8 $0.31), DRI (10/8 $0.55), FCX (10/10 $0.31), GPS (10/6 $0.22)

Ex-dividend Positions Next Week:  none

 

 

For the coming week the existing positions have lots that still require the sale of contracts:   AGQ, CHK, CLF, COH, FCX, GDX, GM, GPS, HAL, HFC, .JCP, JOY, K,  LULU, LVS, MCP, MOS,  NEM, RIG, SBGI, TGT, WFM, WLT (See “Weekly Performance” spreadsheet or PDF file)



* If you don’t have a program to read or modify spreadsheets, you can download the OpenOffice Suite at no cost.



Daily Market Update – October 10, 2014

 

  

 

Daily Market Update – October 10, 2014 (8:30 AM)

The Week in Review will be posted by 6 PM tonight and the Weekend Update will be posted by Noon on Sunday.

The following are possible outcomes for today:

Assignments:  none

Rollovers:  EMC

Expirations: WFM, DOW, GPS, HAL

 

The following were ex-dividend this week: GPS (10/6 $0.22), CPB (10/8 $0.31), DRI (10/8 $0.55), CHK (10/10 $0.09), FCX (10/10 $0.31)

There are currently no ex-dividend positions for next week

 

Trades, if any, will be attempted to be made by 3:30 PM EDT

 

 

Daily Market Update – October 9, 2014 (Close)

 

  

 

Daily Market Update – October 9, 2014 (Close)

It’s almost a little eerie when one day can go down 272 points and the next day can go up 274 points.

Of course when the third day see prospects of a 300 point decline it gets a little tiresome. Even if you do like the idea of volatility rising the process can really be painful.

While yesterday’s rebound was definitely welcome there’s still no escaping the historical significance of such large upward moves. They tend to occur during market downtrends and aren’t generally parts of the building blocks that take markets higher in a sustained fashion.

The October 2007 to March 2009 period was filled with those kind of days and if you can remember back to those days how many times did you think “finally, we’re done with all of the selling”?

There was a lot of talk about how yesterday represented a “key reversal” day.

That’s one where the market opens lower than the previous day, then moves to a new low, before reversing course to close higher than the previous day’s high.

There was a lot of talk about it because many see it as a very bullish sign, although like so many such signs it’s not as valid as many would like to believe. In fact, Thomas Bulkowski, who extensively studies chart patterns has reported that about 51% of the time that a key reversal occurs during a market downtrend, such as we’re currently experiencing, the trend continues downward after the  key reversal.

I don’t know if he’s right, but somebody is wrong when it comes to the significance of the exalted key reversal.

Still, yesterday was welcome as we head into the final days of the week and always hopeful for some combination of assignments and rollovers.

One of those hopes, The Gap, got dashed yesterday after the close, as its CEO unexpectedly announced hos retirement, saying he was unable to commit anew to the time being asked of him.

That’s a very bizarre reason, but more bizarre has been the immediate reaction to the announcement, particularly considering that there was nothing terribly spectacular about the CEO or his performance. If anything, during his reign, The Gap has been incredibly inconsistent in its performance and certainly not a stellar retail performer.

The market may be reacting to uncertainty over the real reasons for his sudden departure. The after hours response came before The Gap released its monthly same store sales, which were flat, but did indicate an increase in expenses, which ordinarily would probably have caused some drop in shares in the aftermarket. However, in the past, The Gap has typically made initial 5% moves in either direction upon same store sales, although often quickly reversing the initial reactions. This time, it’s a 10% move in the absence of significant same store sales news.

So that will be one to watch and weather as we await the real story.

For the morning there didn’t appear to be a follow through forthcoming to yesterday’s gains, although precious metals were showing a large bounce after prolonged selling. As often is the case, there’s no readily apparent reason for doing so other than the possibility that those inclined to trade precious metals suddenly believe that the selling was overdone, perhaps buoyed a bit by yesterday’s FOMC.

While I would have liked to see the same thing in today’s equity market, it’s a good thing that I didn’t hold my breath. I would have been happy with some stability in  prices and simply a little respite from a large move opposite to yesterday’s in an effort to see those positions set to expire tomorrow either be assigned or rolled over.

That wasn’t asking for too much, but today’s sell off was really over the top and again had no real reason for being, no matter how much people point once again at Martio Draghi for calling for economic reform from European leaders.

So while I was hoping to get some rollovers either done today or be in better position to do so, it was a repeat of last Thursday when the possibility was also made less likely.

Last week Friday’s strong gain salvaged the week, but I’m not so positive about the same happening tomorrow, as today was beginning to feel a little more like a blow off kind of sale, but still didn’t reach that level.

As far as rollovers go,  you may have noticed that with, what may be a temporary increase in volatility, I’ve taken the opportunity to take advantage of some improving premiums in forward weeks by rolling over to periods other then the next coming week. That offers a little extra bit of diversification and reduces dependency on a single week, which can easily be subject to a sudden adverse price movement.

With a few positions already set to expire next week, I may look for tomorrow’s rollover opportunities beyond that monthly cycle end date to further add to that spreading of risk, if possible.

December anyone?

 

Daily Market Update – October 9, 2014

 

  

 

Daily Market Update – October 9, 2014 (8:30 AM)

It’s almost a little eerie when one day can go down 272 points and the next day can go up 274 points.

While yesterday’s rebound was definitely welcome there’s still no escaping the historical significance of such large upward moves. They tend to occur during market downtrends and aren’t generally parts of the building blocks that take markets higher in a sustained fashion.

The October 2007 to March 2009 period was filled with those kind of days and if you can remember back to those days how many times did you think “finally, we’re done with all of the selling”?

There was a lot of talk about how yesterday represented a “key reversal” day.

That’s one where the market opens lower than the previous day, then moves to a new low, before reversing course to close higher than the previous day’s high.

There was a lot of talk about it because many see it as a very bullish sign, although like so many such signs it’s not as valid as many would like to believe. In fact, Thomas Bulkowski, who extensively studies chart patterns has reported that about 51% of the time that a key reversal occurs during a market downtrend, such as we’re currently experiencing, the trend continues downward after the  key reversal.

I don’t know if he’s right, but somebody is wrong when it comes to the significance of the exalted key reversal.

Still, yesterday was welcome as we head into the final days of the week and always hopeful for some combination of assignments and rollovers.

One of those hopes, The Gap, got dashed yesterday after the close, as its CEO unexpectedly announced hos retirement, saying he was unable to commit anew to the time being asked of him.

That’s a very bizarre reason, but more bizarre has been the immediate reaction to the announcement, particularly considering that there was nothing terribly spectacular about the CEO or his performance. If anything, during his reign, The Gap has been incredibly inconsistent in its performance and certainly not a stellar retail performer.

The market may be reacting to uncertainty over the real reasons for his sudden departure. The after hours response came before The Gap released its monthly same store sales, which were flat, but did indicate an increase in expenses, which ordinarily would probably have caused some drop in shares in the aftermarket. However, in the past, The Gap has typically made initial 5% moves in either direction upon same store sales, although often quickly reversing the initial reactions. This time, it’s a 10% move in the absence of significant same store sales news.

So that will be one to watch and weather as we await the real story.

For the morning there doesn’t appear to be a follow through forthcoming to yesterday’s gains, although precious metals are showing a large bounce after prolonged selling. As often is the case, there’s no readily apparent reason for doing so other than the possibility that those inclined to trade precious metals suddenly believe that the selling was overdone, perhaps buoyed a bit by yesterday’s FOMC.

While I’d like to see the same thing in today’s equity market, I’m not going to hold my breath. Instead, I’d be happy with some stability in  prices and a little respite from a large move opposite to yesterday’s in an effort to see those positions set to expire tomorrow either be assigned or rolled over.

As far as rollovers go,  you may have noticed that with, what may be a temporary increase in volatility, I’ve taken the opportunity to take advantage of some improving premiums in forward weeks by rolling over to periods other then the next coming week. That offers a little extra bit of diversification and reduces dependency on a single week, which can easily be subject to a sudden adverse price movement.

With a few positions already set to expire next week, I may look for today and tomorrow’s rollover opportunities beyond that monthly cycle end date to further add to that spreading of risk, if possible.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Daily Market Update – October 8, 2014 (Close)

 

  

 

Daily Market Update – October 8, 2014 (Close)

There are lots of people who are dismayed to see the market pointing mildly higher this morning. Imagine how they must feel as it came to its unlikely close this afternoon.

That’s because they believe that after a 272 point sell off the real healthy market action would be to have a blow out kind of selling environment. That is thought to be akin to “getting it all out of your system” and then being in a position to start all anew.

Instead, thanks mostly to a dovish FOMC Statement that took notice of European weakness, the market erased yesterday’s loss and even had one of those “key reversals” that get mentioned every now and then.

Thoose are supposed to be very, very positive signals.

The “blow out” theorists do seem to have history on their side, but it tends to be the sort of thing that you see during a protracted market decline and has more false positives than you might want to know about if you believed in that theory. Just look at the period of time between October 2007 and March 2009 and you’ll see lots of declines that could have qualified as “blow outs,” but were predictive of nothing.

Before getting too smug about what means what, those key reversals aren’t perfect, either.

On the other hand, there’s probably nothing terribly wrong with creating another one of these 5% declines that seem to occur every two months. We’re less than 1.5% away from having done that and if the past two years is any guide, after having done so it’s off to more new records.

That pattern will remain to be a valid one until it’s broken and it’s anyone’s guess whether we are on a path to break the pattern now, but we should know soon, as the peak to trough back to peak over the past two years has generally been on the order of less than 3 weeks.

Did today break reconfirm that pattern?

Well, maybe, but you would have been prematurely optimistic if saying the same thing last Friday on a similar kind of day.

But with today being an FOMC Statement release day there may be a little more riding on it than usual. Always something that the market finds a reason to react to, today any change that could be construed as indicating interest rate hikes coming sooner than expected could really tip the already nervous market into something of a blow off kind of selling pattern.

That’s true even though we all know that with each passing month that interest rate hike becomes a case of “sooner rather than later.”

Yesterday’s sell-off in advance of today’s FOMC was surprising and again, there really wasn’t very much of substance to support that kind of selling, although fingers were pointed at Europe. However, the market which had already opened gapped down from the previous day’s close took a real drop sometime after 2 PM without any new news to account for that sell off.

This kind of back and forth alternation between losses and gains, especially in the magnitude of the changes is different from the 5% corrections that we’ve gotten accustomed to seeing. Those have been more based on smaller, but sustained movements lower, just as the bounces higher had also not been characterized by explosive movements.

What that means is also anyone’s guess. In the past 5 years it has both meant a highly tumultuous market with a large net decline, as well as a market that essentially was treading water.

Volatility, as the day was getting ready to begin trading, was at the same level it was at its peak during the last market mini-correction, when the S&P 500 stood at 1925, which was 10 points below yesterday’s close.

In the past year volatility hit its peak in February, approximately 25% higher than it currently sits and the S&P 500 was then at 1741, which would represent a very sizeable drop from the current level.

However, even that February volatility peak is fairly low by historical standards, so there’s some reason to be concerned, but only if there is a breech of the usual 10% correction threshold.

For those that have cash reserves, despite what appears to be some bargain prices, I would still be reluctant to do much shopping, although an occasional purchase can still be a timely one.Today’s surge after the FOMC report was interesting to watch, but other than looking for some opportunities to sell calls, it wasn’t very enticing as far as making me part with any more money.

If you’ve been sitting back, today was a good day to continue inactivity and tomorrow may be the same. If the market is destined to go higher after today’s key reversal, let it do so and let it do the hard lifting. If it results in some assignments, that would be just fine by me.

 

Daily Market Update – October 8, 2014

 

  

 

Daily Market Update – October 8, 2014 (9:00 AM)

There are lots of people who are dismayed to see the market pointing mildly higher this morning.

That’s because they believe that after a 272 point sell off the real healthy market action would be to have a blow out kind of selling environment. That is thought to be akin to “getting it all out of your system” and then being in a position to start all anew.

The “blow out” theorists do seem to have history on their side, but it tends to be the sort of thing that you see during a protracted market decline and has more false positives than you might want to know about if you believed in that theory. Just look at the period of time between October 2007 and March 2009 and you’ll see lots of declines that could have qualified as “blow outs,” but were predictive of nothing.

On the other hand, there’s probably nothing terribly wrong with creating another one of these 5% declines that seem to occur every two months. We’re less than 1.5% away from having done that and if the past two years is any guide, after having done so it’s off to more new records.

That pattern will remain to be a valid one until it’s broken and it’s anyone’s guess whether we are on a path to break the pattern now, but we should know soon, as the peak to trough back to peak over the past two years has generally been on the order of less than 3 weeks.

But with today being an FOMC Statement release day there may be a little more riding on it than usual. Always something that the market finds a reason to react to, today any change that could be construed as indicating interest rate hikes coming sooner than expected could really tip the already nervous market into something of a blow off kind of selling pattern.

That’s true even though we all know that with each passing month that interest rate hike becomes a case of “sooner rather than later.”

Yesterday’s sell-off in advance of today’s FOMC was surprising and again, there really wasn’t very much of substance to support that kind of selling, although fingers were pointed at Europe. However, the market which had already opened gapped down from the previous day’s close took a real drop sometime after 2 PM without any new news to account for that sell off.

This kind of back and forth alternation between losses and gains, especially in the magnitude of the changes is different from the 5% corrections that we’ve gotten accustomed to seeing. Those have been more based on smaller, but sustained movements lower, just as the bounces higher had also not been characterized by explosive movements.

What that means is also anyone’s guess. In the past 5 years it has both meant a highly tumultuous market with a large net decline, as well as a market that essentially was treading water.

Volatility is now at the same level it was at its peak during the last market mini-correction, when the S&P 500 stood at 1925, which is 10 points below yesterday’s close.

In the past year volatility hit its peak in February, approximately 25% higher than it currently sits and the S&P 500 was then at 1741, which would represent a very sizeable drop from the current level.

However, even that February volatility peak is fairly low by historical standards, so there’s some reason to be concerned, but only if there is a breech of the usual 10% correction threshold.

For those that have cash reserves, despite what appears to be some bargain prices, I would be reluctant to do much shopping, although an occasional purchase can still be a timely one.

If you’ve been sitting back, today seems to be a good day to continue inactivity.

 

Daily Market Update – October 7, 2014 (Close)

 

  

 

Daily Market Update – October 7, 2014 (CLose)

It’s hard to say whether yesterday was a disappointment or not.

While it’s true that the early morning gain never quite survived, neither did it give way to any kind of tangible profit taking.

But even if you had doubts about yesterday, there can’t be any about today.

This morning appeared ready to start exactly where yesterday left off. The market was pretty ambivalent yesterday and had a hard time deciding whether to finish higher or lower. This morning it looked as if there would be a mildly lower opening with no real news to fuel anything.

That changed, but without any real obvious reason and the market ended with another of these 200+ point moves, but in the wrong direction, unless you’re really into volatility.

Even I’m not that into volatility.

While yesterday had the Hewlett Packard news which by all appearances was a dizzying spin of why the split up was a reflection of Hewlett Packard’s success, today had nothing.

Other than all of the scheduled speakers this week and tomorrow’s FOMC Statement release, that pretty much describes the rest of the week.

In the meantime the market had been sitting just short of the mid-way point for its 2 year pattern of mini-corrections. It was getting ready to start the morning about 2.3% below its high from a few weeks ago, so it was really anyone’s guess where the next stop would be be.

Tomorrow morning the only thing to guess is whether we will see the market takes us to and perhaps beyond that 5% mini-correction level that we last saw at the very end of July, as the market ended today about 3.6% below its high.

Tomorrow comes the next challenge.

With the anticipation for the last FOMC Statement being so focused on the phrase “considerable time,” as it was being used to describe when the increase in interest rates would start, somewhere along the line will come the realization that with each passing month, by definition that “considerable time” has been shortened by a month.

Sooner or later there will be no time left and rates will go higher.

Although it shouldn’t come as a surprise, you can be reasonably assured that the market will react as if it was a surprise and then will bounce back from the shock that should never have been a shock.

But that scenario may not have to play out for some considerable time.

What will play out almost immediately will be earnings, that really get going tomorrow, even though the traditional leader of the season, Alcoa is no longer in the DJIA.

This earnings period will be interesting because the likelihood is that retail will have some good news, but energy will have some bad news, especially as it gives forward guidance.

If you asked anyone what the future would hold for the energy sector, given all of the geo-political risk, they would have had to have been crazy to not believe that the future for profits was incredibly bright. But this period in time is markedly different, as even with all of the world’s craziness energy prices (and precious metals) are plummeting.

They will surely go up at some point, but as the expression goes “if not now, when?”

After a couple of purchases yesterday, I wouldn’t have minded adding some others for the week, but am still not committed to it. If anything, I may be interested in buying back some of last week’s assigned positions, but I’m not too convinced that I’ll have much interest to break out beyond those names at the moment. As the afternoon progressed and there was a sell-off on top of the already weak numbers, there was even less reason to make those purchases.

As has become the pattern of late, unless there’s a spike higher to open a session, giving an opportunity to sell calls, the likelihood is that sitting back and watching to see how that early trading evolves is the way to go. That was definitely the way to go today and it was also a good idea to resist anything looking like a value.

With the exception of last Friday when the market indicated higher and stayed that way, these early morning trading patterns have had very poor predictive value. Lower opening trading hasn’t offered much in the way of value and higher opens haven’t led to higher closes, for the most part.

I had suspected that the typical FOMC pattern would be in play today, unless, as last month, someone thought to have an inside track, such as the Wall Street Journal’s Jon Hilsenrath, offers an opinion on what tomorrow will bring. Otherwise, there was very little reason to suspect any kind of accentuated movement in either direction, as most traders are playing very conservatively now.

Most of the time that’s not too bad of an idea.

Today, though, they were neither conservative nor in panic, but maybe a blow off from some kind of panic is better than this seemingly unwarranted syncopated sell-off that has been going on for the past three weeks.

But who knows, maybe Janet Yellen will give us a brief respite tomorrow.

 

Daily Market Update – October 7, 2014

 

  

 

Daily Market Update – October 7, 2014 (9:15 AM)

It’s hard to say whether yesterday was a disappointment or not.

While it’s true that the early morning gain never quite survived, neither did it give way to any kind of tangible profit taking.

This morning appears ready to start exactly where yesterday left off. The market was pretty ambivalent yesterday and had a hard time deciding whether to finish higher or lower. This morning it looks as if there will be a mildly lower opening with no real news to fuel anything.

While yesterday had the Hewlett Packard news which by all appearances was a dizzying spin of why the split up was a reflection of Hewlett Packard’s success, today has nothing.

Other than all of the scheduled speakers this wek and tomorrow’s FOMC Statement release, that pretty much describes the rest of the week.

In the meantime the market is sitting just short of the mid-way point for its 2 year pattern of mini-corrections. It is currently about 2.3% below its high from a few weeks ago, so it really is anyone’s guess where the next stop will be.

With the anticipation for the last FOMC Statement being so focused on the phrase “considerable time,” as it was being used to describe when the increase in interest rates would start, somewhere along the line will come the realization that with each passing month, by definition that “considerable time” has been shortened by a month.

Sooner or later there will be no time left and rates will go higher.

Although it shouldn’t come as a surprise, you can be reasonably assured that the market will react as if it was a surprise and then will bounce back from the shock that should never have been a shock.

But that scenario may not have to play out for some considerable time.

What will play out almost immediately will be earnings, that really get going tomorrow, even though the traditional leader of the season, Alcoa is no longer in the DJIA.

This earnings period will be interesting because the likelihood is that retail will have some good news, but energy will have some bad news, especially as it gives forward guidance.

If you asked anyone what the future would hold for the energy sector, given all of the geo-political risk, they would have had to have been crazy to not believe that the future for profits was incredibly bright. But this period in time is markedly different, as even with all of the world’s craziness energy prices (and precious metals) are plummeting.

They will surely go up at some point, but as the expression goes “if not now, when?”

After a couple of purchases yesterday, I wouldn’t mind adding some others for the week, but am not committed to it. If anything, I may be interested in buying back some of last week’s assigned positions, but I’m not too convinced that I’ll have much interest to break out beyond those names at the moment.

As has become the pattern of late, unless there’s a spike higher to open the session, giving an opportunity to sell calls, the likelihood is that sitting back and watching to see how that early trading evolves is the way to go.

With the exception of last Friday when the market indicated higher and stayed that way, these early morning trading patterns have had very poor predictive value. Lower opening trading hasn’t offered much in the way of value and higher opens haven’t led to higher closes, for the most part.

I suspect that the typical FOMC pattern will be in play today, unless, as last month, someone thought to have an inside track, such as the Wall STreet Journal’s Jon Hilsenrath, offers an opinion on what tomorrow will bring. Otherwise, there’s very little reason to suspect any kind of accentuated movement in either direction, as most traders are playing very conservatively now.

Most of the time that’s not too bad of an idea.

 

Daily Market Update – October 6, 2014 (Close)

 

  

 

Daily Market Update – October 6, 2014 (Close)

What a wild week ahead.

There’s not too much as far as scheduled economic news goes and there may also be some peaceful short term resolution to the protests underway in Hong Kong, but there will be an incredible amount of hot air generated this week.

Today, Secretary of Treasury Jack Lew speaks and on Thursday European Central Bank President Mario Draghi speaks

In-between will be Wednesday’s release of the monthly FOMC Statement and the eager anticipation around the wording used to indicate what we all know is now coming at least one month sooner than we thought last month.

Finally, there are 12 speeches scheduled to be given by members of the FOMC this week, winding up with hawkish member, Richard Fisher, who is able to move markets very much in the same manner that the Chairman, Janet Yellen can do, despite the fact that Fisher has frequently been wrong in his opinions and predictions.

Unfortunately, he speaks just a few hours before the market finishes its trading for the week and he has a habit of sending shares lower when he focuses on the need to increase interest rates sooner.

This morning none of that seemed to matter as the pre-opening futures indicated a moderately higher opening, possibly buoyed by Hewlett Packard’s split into 2 companies. Nonetheless, 28 out of 30 of the DJIA components were higher prior to the bell ringing,

That kind of opening would have been welcome, even though I ordinarily like to see weakness to start the week.

That’s because I generally am looking to replace assigned positions and want to spend money, but don’t want to overspend.

This week, however, is another week that I’m not overly anxious to spend much money. Following 2 weeks of very confusing trading and seeing large moves in both directions with little or no provocation, it seems a little reckless to commit one way or another.

Today really did nothing to get rid of the confusion. After looking as if there might be a possible early triple digit move to the upside the market loss all of it and actually was down as low as about 70 points, only to finish the day virtually unchanged.

Rational thinking might say that there’s more downside than upside, but when has rational thinking really worked terribly well in the markets?  If rational thinking had any role most people would have missed the last couple of thousand of points gain in the DJIA while awaiting the correction that we all knew to be obviously lurking.

With a handful of positions scheduled to expire this week and the same for next week’s monthly cycle end, at the moment, if making any new purchases I’m likely to look to add to this week’s expirations or possibly go out to October 24th.

In addition to the usual considerations whenever buying any new positions this week begins yet another earnings season, so that has to be thrown into the mix.

However, for the first time in a while, I’m actually optimistic about the upcoming earnings. The potential confounder will be the impact of share buy-backs. During the past few quarters those buy-backs have artificially boosted earnings per share, even as revenues were flat or even decreasing.

This time around, I expect revenues to be higher, especial in retail and consumer sections, but expect that buy backs have slowed down. That may result in higher revenues, but not the same pace of share reduction, which could lead to some earnings per share disappointments.

So as the bell was getting ready to ring, I was hoping that the strength would continue, but as we all know those kind of mild to moderate pre-open futures really don’t mean much of anything. Just as so often happens, today’s early jump higher just withered away.

Although there wasn’t much of a net change today, the constant back and forth did end up increasing volatility, which had fallen on Friday’s straight climb higher. That climb wasn’t too much, though, and did nothing really to make finding extended option opportunities any easier. Nonetheless, for now, I’d prefer to see some higher moving prices, even at the expense of volatility, if that meant a greater likelihood of putting some existing stock positions to work.

This week I’d rather see myself producing income in that manner, along with more than the usual number of ex-dividend positions, than through the depletion of cash reserves.

Like last week, it’s very possible that the two early purchases for the week may be as much as will be made, although with any further declines in eBay, Comcast and Walgreen, the stocks assigned this past Friday, it may just be time to buy those back.

Daily Market Update – October 6, 2014

 

  

 

Daily Market Update – October 6, 2014 (9:00 AM)

What a wild week ahead.

There’s not too much as far as scheduled economic news goes and there may also be some peaceful short term resolution to the protests underway in Hong Kong, but there will be an incredible amount of hot air generated this week.

Today, Secretary of Treasury Jack Lew speaks and on Thursday European Central Bank President Mario Draghi speaks

In-between will be Wednesday’s release of the monthly FOMC Statement and the eager anticipation around the wording used to indicate what we all know is now coming at least one month sooner than we thought last month.

Finally, there are 12 speeches scheduled to be given by members of the FOMC this week, winding up with hawkish member, Richard Fisher, who is able to move markets very much in the same manner that the Chairman, Janet Yellen can do, despite the fact that Fisher has frequently been wrong in his opinions and predictions.

Unfortunately, he speaks just a few hours before the market finishes its trading for the week and he has a habit of sending shares lower when he focuses on the need to increase interest rates sooner.

This morning none of that seems to matter as the pre-opening futures are indicating a moderately higher opening, possibly buoyed by Hewlett Packard’s possible split into 2 companies. Nonetheless, 28 out of 30 of the DJIA components were higher prior to the bell ringing,

That kind of opening would be welcome, even though I ordinarily like to see weakness to start the week.

That’s because I generally am looking to replace assigned positions and want to spend money, but don’t want to overspend.

This week, however, is another week that I’m not overly anxious to spend much money. Following 2 weeks of very confusing trading and seeing large moves in both directions with little or no provocation, it seems a little reckless to commit one way or another.

Rational thinking might say that there’s more downside than upside, but when has rational thinking really worked terribly well in the markets?  If rational thinking had any role most people would have missed the last couple of thousand of points gain in the DJIA while awaiting the correction that we all knew to be obviously lurking.

With a handful of positions scheduled to expire this week and the same for next week’s monthly cycle end, at the moment, if making any new purchases I’m likely to look to add to this week’s expirations or possibly go out to October 24th.

In addition to the usual considerations whenever buying any new positions this week begins yet another earnings season, so that has to be thrown into the mix.

However, for the first time in a while, I’m actually optimistic about the upcoming earnings. The potential confounder will be the impact of share buy-backs. During the past few quarters those buy-backs have artificially boosted earnings per share, even as revenues were flat or even decreasing.

This time around, I expect revenues to be higher, especial in retail and consumer sections, but expect that buy backs have slowed down. That may result in higher revenues, but not the same pace of share reduction, which could lead to some earnings per share disappointments.

So as the bell rings, I hope that the strength continues and doesn’t do as so often has been the case and just withers away. If that strength does continue and builds on Friday’s close, volatility will move lower and that may make it a little more difficult to find expanded option opportunities. Nonetheless, for now, I’d prefer to see some higher moving prices, even at the expense of volatility, if that meant a greater likelihood of putting some existing stock positions to work.

This week I’d rather see myself producing income in that manner, along with more than the usual number of ex-dividend positions, than through the depletion of cash reserves.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Dashboard – October 6 – 10. 2014

 

 

 

 

 

Selections

MONDAY:  Unbelievable week for hot air enthusiasts. 12 speeches by FOMC members, one by Treasury Secretary Jack Lew and One by ECB Presient Mario Draghi, in addition to Wednesday’s FOMC Statement. Other than that, nothing else really of interest.

TUESDAY:     A  mildly negative start to the day looks to be the logical place to start after yesterday’s fade and before tomorrow’s FOMC.

WEDNESDAY:  Coming off a 272 point loss makes today’s FOMC Statement even more important as the slightest change in wording could tip negative sentiment into what many believe is the “blow off” selling that is necessary to get the market back on its higher track.

THURSDAY:    Down 272 one day, up 274 the next, but for the past 3 weeks that’s not all that unusual. Today shows no follow through to begin the morning and no expected catalysts, but since when are those important?

FRIDAY:  Not much relief in sight to end the week as market is now 4% below its September highs and up less than 5% for the year.

 



 

                                                                                                                                           

Today's TradesCash-o-Meter

 

 

 





 “SNEAK PEEK AT NEXT WEEK” APPEARS ON FRIDAYS

Sneak PeekPie Chart Distribution

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Weekly Summary

  

Weekend Update – October 5, 2014

This week’s markets didn’t respond so positively when Mario Draghi, the head of the European Central Bank failed to deliver on what many had been expecting for quite some time.

The financial markets wanted to hear Draghi follow through on his previous market moving rhetoric with an ECB version of Quantitative Easing, but it didn’t happen. After two years of waiting for some meaningful follow through to his assertion that “we will do whatever it takes” Draghi’s appearance as simply an empty suit becomes increasingly apparent and increasingly worrisome.

On a positive note, as befitting European styling, that suit is exquisitely tailored, but still hasn’t shown that it can stand up to pressure.

It also wasn’t the first time our expectations were dashed and no one was particularly pleased to hear Draghi place blame for the state of the various economies in the European Union at the feet of its politicians as John Chambers, the head of Standard and Poor’s Sovereign Debt Committee did some years earlier when lowering the debt rating of the United States.

Placing the blame on politicians also sends a message that the remedy must also come from politicians and that is something that tends to only occur at the precipice.

While the Biblical text referring to a young child leading a pack of wild animals is a forward looking assessment of an optimistic future, believing that an empty suit can lead a pack of self-interested politicians is an optimism perhaps less realistic than the original passage.

At least that’s what the markets believed.

Befitting the previous week’s volatility that was marked by triple digit moves in alternating fashion, Draghi’s induced 238 point decline was offset by Friday’s 208 point gain following the encouraging Employment Situation Report. Whereas the previous week’s DJIA saw a net decline of only 166 points on absolute daily moves of 810 points, this past week was more subdued. The DJIA lost only 103 points while the absolute daily changes were 519 points.

The end result of Friday’s advance was to return volatility to where it had ended last week, which was a disappointment, as you would like to see volatility rise if there has been a net decline in the broader market. Still, if you’re selling options, that level is better than it was two weeks ago.

While Friday’s gain was encouraging it is a little less so when realizing that such memorable gains are very often found during market downtrends. There is at least very little doubt that the market behavior during the past two weeks represents some qualitative difference in its behavior and an isolated move higher may not be very reflective of any developing trend, but rather reactive to a different developing trend.

As with Draghi, falling for the rhetoric of such a positive response to the Employment Situation Report, may lead to some disappointment.

As usual, the week’s potential stock selections are classified as being in Traditional, Double Dip Dividend, Momentum or “PEE” categories.

Many of the positions being considered this week are recently highlighted positions made more appealing following recent price pullbacks rather than on any company specific factors. Of course, when looking at stocks whose price has recently fallen at some point the question regarding value versus “value trap” has to be entertained.

With some increase in volatility, despite the rollback this week, I’ve taken opportunity to rollover existing positions to forward weeks when expanded option contracts have been available. As those premiums have increased a bit being able to do so helps to reduce the risk of having so many positions expire concurrently and being all exposed to a short term and sudden price decline.

Just imagine how different the outcome for the week may have been if Thursday’s and Friday’s results were reversed if you were relying on the ability to rollover positions or have them assigned.

However, with the start of earnings season this week there’s reason to be a little more attentive when selecting positions and their contract expiration dates as earnings may play a role in the premiums. While certainly making those premiums more enticing it also increases the risk of ownership at a time when the relative market risk may outweigh the reward.

One stock not reporting earnings this week, but still having an enriched option premium is The Gap (GPS). It opens the week for trading on its ex-dividend date and later in the week is expected to announce its monthly same store sales, being one of the few remaining companies to do so. Those results are inexplicably confusing month to month and shares tend to make strong price movements, frequently in alternating directions from month to month. For that uncertainty comes a very attractive option premium for shares that despite that event driven volatility tend to trade in a fairly well defined range over the longer term.

When it comes to their fashion offerings you may be ambivalent, but when it comes to that kind of price movement and predictability, what’s not to like?

If you’re waiting for a traditional correction, one that requires a 10% pullback, look no farther than Mosaic (MOS). While it had been valiantly struggling to surpass the $50 level on its long road to recovery from the shock of the break-up of the potash cartel, it has now fallen about 13% in 5 weeks. Most recently Mosaic announced a cutback in phosphate production and lowered its guidance and when a market is already on edge it doesn’t need successive blows like those offered by Mosaic as it approaches its 52 week low.

Can shares offer further disappointment when it reports earnings at the end of this month? Perhaps, but for those with a longer term outlook, at this level shares may be repeating the opportunity they offered upon hitting their lows on the cartel’s dissolution for serial purchase and assignment, while offering a premium enhanced by uncertainty.

Seagate Technology (STX) is also officially in that correction camp, having dropped 10% in that same 5 week period. It has done so in the absence of any meaningful news other than perhaps the weight of its own share price, with its decline having come directly from its 52 week high point.

For a company that has become fairly staid, Pfizer (PFE) has been moving about quite a bit lately. Whether in the news for having sought a tax inversion opportunity or other acquisitions, it is clearly a company that is in need of some sort of catalyst. That continuing kind of movement back and forth has been pronounced very recently and should begin making its option premium increasingly enticing. With shares seemingly seeking a $30 home, regardless of which side it is currently on and an always attractive dividend, Pfizer may start getting more and more interesting, particularly in an otherwise labile market.

Dow Chemical (DOW) is one of those stocks that used to be a main stay of my investing. It’s price climb from the $40 to $50 range made it less so, but with the realization that the $50 level may be the new normal, especially with activist investor pressure, it is again on the radar screen, That’s especially true after this week’s price drop. I had been targeting the $52.50 level having been most recently assigned at $53.50, but now it appears to be gift priced. Unfortunately, it may be a perfect example of that age old dilemma regarding value, having already greatly under-performed the market since its recent high the “value trap” part may have already been played out.

While MasterCard (MA) is ex-dividend this week, it is certainly not one to chase in order to capture its dividend. With a payout ratio far below its competitors it would seem that an increase might be warranted. However, what makes MasterCard attractive is that it has seemingly found a trading range and is now situated at about the mid-point of that range. While there is some recent tumult in the world of payments and with some continuing uncertainty regarding its presence in Russia, MasterCard continues to be worth consideration, particularly as it too has significantly under-performed the S&P 500 in the past two weeks.

Equal in its under-performance to MasterCard during that period has been Texas Instruments (TXN). I’ve been eager to add some technology sector positions for a while and haven’t done so as often as necessary to develop some better diversification. Along with Intel (INTC) which I considered last week, as well, Texas Instruments is back to a price level that has my attention. Like Intel, it reports earnings soon and also goes ex-dividend during the October 2014 option cycle. Unlike Intel, however, Texas Instruments doesn’t have a couple of gap ups in price over the past three months that may represent some additional earnings related risk.

When it comes to under-performance it is possible that Coach (COH) may soon qualify as being synonymous with that designation. Not too surprisingly its past performance in the past two weeks, while below that of the S&P 500 may be more directly tied to an improved price performance seen in its competitor for investor interest, Michael Kors (KORS). However, Coach seems to have established support at its current level and may offer a similar opportunity for serial purchase and assignment as had been previously offered by Mosaic shares.

Finally, with the exception of YUM Brands (YUM) all of the other stocks highlighted this week have under-performed the S&P 500 since hitting its recent high on September 18, 2014. YUM Brands reports earnings this week and is often very volatile when it does so. This time, hover, the options market doesn’t seem to be expecting a very large move, only about 4.5%. Neither is there an opportunity to achieve a 1% ROI through the sale of a put option at a strike outside of the range implied. However, YUM Brands is one of those stocks, that if I had sold puts upon, I wouldn’t mind owning if there was a likelihood of assignment.

So often YUM Brands share price is held hostage to food safety issues in China and so often it successfully is able to  see its share price regain sudden losses. That, however, hasn’t been the case thus far since it’s summertime loss. There are probably little expectations for an upside surprise upon release of earnings and as such there may be some limited downside, perhaps explaining the option market’s subdued pricing.

If facing assignment of puts being sold with an upcoming ex-dividend date the following week, I would be inclined to accept assignment and proceed from the point of ownership rather than trying to continue avoiding ownership of shares. However, with the slightest indication of political unrest spreading from Hong Kong to the Chinese mainland that may be a decision destined for regret, just like the purchase of an ill-fitting and overly priced suit.

Traditional Stocks: Dow Chemical, Pfizer, Texas Instruments, The Gap

Momentum: Coach, Mosaic, Seagate Technology

Double Dip Dividend:  MasterCard (10/7)

Premiums Enhanced by Earnings: YUM Brands (10/7 PM)

Remember, these are just guidelines for the coming week. The above selections may become actionable, most often coupling a share purchase with call option sales or the sale of covered put contracts, in adjustment to and consideration of market movements. The overriding objective is to create a healthy income stream for the week with reduction of trading risk.